{"id":"W2118072459","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01164.x","title":"Making better biogeographical predictions of species’ distributions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":653,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Université de Lausanne","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Biological dispersal; Ecology; Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Species distribution; Ecological network; Documentation; Computer science; Geography; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001682936,0.00007870597,0.0001858484,0.00006733039,0.00009877862,0.000009911551,0.0001624133,0.00009329641,0.0329053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001239736,0.00006892342,0.000120554,0.0002891063,0.0003403708,0.00005403899,0.00007680814,0.0001567278,0.0001114211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002431102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009328386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001123924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001617054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999075,0.00001482629,0.0004211564,0.00009682564,0.0001889659,0.0002032014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994729,0.00004793112,0.0003074071,0.0000993817,0.00002367311,0.00004867171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001538828,0.001104599,0.7030936,0.0000127513,0.00008377856,0.00003042884,0.00008536386,0.0008182252,0.0563012,0.0704204,0.1672874,0.0006083887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003789734,0.00008967066,0.9348171,0.000002641124,0.00003627709,0.00004727321,0.0002290642,0.00001686878,0.001380546,0.002821711,0.06011149,0.00006833253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.914308,0.00001081457,0.001589323,0.00115585,0.0002313664,0.000074444,0.0001199094,0.00001110465,0.08249921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993593,0.00001557242,0.000298096,0.0001401163,0.0001093712,0.000004204105,0.0000254894,0.000004597744,0.00004321358],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2317235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9679788,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01710593112616347,"score_gpt":0.2367956439249994,"score_spread":0.2196897127988359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}