{"id":"W2118147250","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00882.x","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF MODERN CANADIAN FAMILY LAW PROCEDURE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Family law; Law; Equity (law); Government (linguistics); Political science; Common law; Substantive law; Civil procedure; Civil law (Civil law); Public law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001186719,0.0001320799,0.0002829538,0.00001323117,0.001412601,0.00003858717,0.000303849,0.00008679058,0.00001718696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007034095,0.00008362892,0.0001266182,0.0003227866,0.0004123595,0.0001237845,0.00001812915,0.0001534292,0.00006634671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007740943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007290501,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3308612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4795486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998302,0.0003420531,0.000292983,0.0001833896,0.0004528365,0.0004267693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990514,0.0001169263,0.0001294041,0.0001900993,0.0003390087,0.0001731448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003482608,0.00004616104,0.001869216,0.001041567,0.0001295077,0.000004063781,0.006611205,0.00000940659,0.000168994,0.7822257,0.1849604,0.0229304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005829875,0.00001066531,0.004830621,0.0006675114,0.00004834035,3.305122e-7,0.002980983,0.000005512736,0.000001761569,0.002033374,0.9892348,0.0001278031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002928757,0.6852533,0.0000171244,0.007911132,0.000325616,0.001026791,0.00001325235,0.0000385698,0.3024854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8299109,0.1648229,0.0001162926,0.00311512,0.00008635484,0.00008064697,0.000002116267,0.00001123422,0.001854389],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8269822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998874,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03395937986141954,"score_gpt":0.3046778811358444,"score_spread":0.2707185012744248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}