{"id":"W2118390776","doi":"10.1017/als.2013.9","title":"The Trial of Li Zhuang: Chinese Lawyers’ Collective Action against Populism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete; American Bar Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Populism; Ideology; Legitimacy; Political science; Politics; Solidarity; Law; Accountability; Collective action; Autonomy; China; Legalism (Western philosophy); Mobilization; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009525044,0.00005555779,0.0001596126,0.00000732266,0.001600589,0.00003866018,0.0000958134,0.00005518601,0.000003017025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001749967,0.0000337349,0.0001878254,0.0001108038,0.0007937631,0.0001232835,0.0000169008,0.0001303105,5.114007e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004768265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001710779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002958988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008957769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992144,0.0001425376,0.0002006634,0.00005207477,0.0002766067,0.0001137547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993455,0.0001610631,0.0002195694,0.00003442532,0.0001786634,0.00006074803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001364695,0.0001280101,0.001612297,0.000006893857,0.0003679571,0.000001878562,0.08269645,0.000004683941,0.0001205223,0.8945625,0.003672328,0.01546181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02132256,0.001258555,0.02576716,0.0001179606,0.0001872051,0.00001253356,0.1417067,0.00002867521,0.00006497252,0.3665591,0.4426115,0.0003630624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5830179,0.0006069331,0.0002218821,0.01340175,0.001626802,0.0002087185,0.000004004082,0.00001017383,0.4009019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978533,0.000729963,0.00005268953,0.0002922122,0.0008904279,0.000001208527,1.611399e-7,0.000002024942,0.0001780549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5280034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996992,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02485209596388147,"score_gpt":0.3081719559403569,"score_spread":0.2833198599764754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}