{"id":"W2118407514","doi":"10.1142/s0219868104000026","title":"ACCOUNTING FOR EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTIONS: A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO HANDLING THE VALUATION ISSUES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Derivatives Accounting","topic":"Financial Reporting and Valuation Research","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vesting; Valuation (finance); Stock options; Non-qualified stock option; Valuation of options; Stock (firearms); Actuarial science; Economics; Accounting; Business; Stock market; Financial economics; Finance; Restricted stock; Engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006756761,0.0002078592,0.0003458459,0.0004719564,0.0008718228,0.001226464,0.0003811625,0.00008663566,0.00001276845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01760148,0.0001495073,0.0002073395,0.0009713612,0.00006444104,0.002666136,0.0001673115,0.0004203038,0.0000230599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001175383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002908199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001231225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001156221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971517,0.00003938112,0.001044651,0.0002696913,0.001055444,0.0004391183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952527,0.0004251049,0.001591833,0.0002119593,0.0024924,0.00002600914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001958975,0.002723593,0.2339494,0.002294319,0.001256696,0.00005745992,0.01379746,0.1985819,0.04720834,0.3660606,0.02425413,0.1078571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01042714,0.0006828831,0.4923207,0.003067201,0.001103626,0.000389526,0.02964175,0.08061291,0.004223177,0.1980119,0.1769526,0.002566565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7473745,0.0001999484,0.2406446,0.009389384,0.0004444086,0.0008180976,9.034457e-7,0.00004734446,0.001080866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939621,0.00001227383,0.05488014,0.001176932,0.00410698,0.00007339947,0.000005679812,0.00004599051,0.00007755159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2583713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1480519000469679,"score_gpt":0.4000187108071036,"score_spread":0.2519668107601357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}