{"id":"W2118444809","doi":"10.1139/x09-197","title":"Regional and ecological patterns in interior Douglas-fir climate–growth relationships in British Columbia, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Tree-ring climate responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Climate change; Precipitation; Dendrochronology; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Geography; Productivity; Snow; Physical geography; Dendroclimatology; Douglas fir; Tree line; Environmental science; Biology; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002256433,0.00006695226,0.0001862088,0.0004106931,0.0002689931,0.0003896554,0.0003419754,0.0001195991,0.001229353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001446642,0.00008421924,0.00002611433,0.0003811097,0.0002646816,0.0002106378,0.00001528314,0.001563917,0.000007908799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001050935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003475631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980376,0.0003546909,0.0003784241,0.0001693774,0.0003709594,0.0006889288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979333,0.0009780859,0.00006992435,0.0001012367,0.0001632291,0.0007541833],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000209574,0.000005432949,0.9944061,0.00001666836,0.0000030347,0.002453357,0.00005207165,0.00002327308,0.000003177313,0.00001706071,0.001106662,0.001892182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003371018,0.0001170478,0.9954491,0.0001262116,0.000001246984,0.000828082,0.000351946,0.00008735918,7.016197e-7,0.0003816505,0.002231789,0.00008772092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978128,0.0002213703,1.329538e-7,0.001073667,0.0002652871,0.0001152163,0.0001295629,0.000001889721,0.0003800897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995865,0.0001198277,0.00007032342,0.00004670199,0.00009342402,0.000001223725,0.00001411552,0.000004509203,0.00006339154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003541648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996837,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04578495189394217,"score_gpt":0.2635751896808293,"score_spread":0.2177902377868871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}