{"id":"W2118444809","doi":"10.1139/x09-197","title":"Regional and ecological patterns in interior Douglas-fir climate–growth relationships in British Columbia, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Tree-ring climate responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Climate change; Precipitation; Dendrochronology; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Geography; Productivity; Snow; Physical geography; Dendroclimatology; Douglas fir; Tree line; Environmental science; Biology; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004079655,0.0002478838,0.0003906944,0.001508126,0.001742921,0.001123009,0.000628068,0.0002708244,0.002159316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001094542,0.0002244622,0.0002249348,0.002956349,0.0006504906,0.0002177009,0.0005486484,0.0004303396,0.0002705228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01397617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01256858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996251,0.00002571361,0.00002351894,0.00009202707,0.00007651858,0.0001571203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982894,0.000159446,0.0001925066,0.00006344132,0.0008404174,0.0004547419],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009081842,0.00002933773,0.9847432,0.00003926365,0.00005923339,0.0001390054,0.00142678,0.0002983347,0.001249621,0.0001210405,0.001649863,0.01015353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000207395,0.000002591283,0.9985232,0.0000179178,0.000009877517,0.00001973254,0.0007283132,0.0001124113,0.00003441223,0.00001122297,0.0005331216,0.0000050621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943348,0.0007871128,0.0000835907,0.0001674927,0.000008065359,0.000009990763,0.0024577,0.00001252427,0.002138813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972054,0.0003658976,0.0001234644,0.00005194384,0.000001812344,0.000007331374,0.001194347,0.000006446941,0.001043293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01397617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1014047,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04578495189394217,"score_gpt":0.2635751896808293,"score_spread":0.2177902377868871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}