{"id":"W2118534650","doi":"10.1109/agile.2008.13","title":"Utilizing Digital Tabletops in Collocated Agile Planning Meetings","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Usability and User Interface Design","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Agile software development; USable; Planner; Computer science; Agile usability engineering; Variety (cybernetics); Agile Unified Process; Usability; Engineering management; Software; Process management; Knowledge management; Software engineering; Engineering; Human–computer interaction; Multimedia; Software development; Software development process; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000207895,0.0001085094,0.0001418637,0.00009508734,0.0001028137,0.0001493785,0.0005709452,0.00005300266,0.00003643115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001053631,0.0001018425,0.00003301644,0.0005198239,0.00005024106,0.0009518361,0.0001835052,0.0001320431,0.00008203513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004854059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006052455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001110197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009164299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989311,0.0000279113,0.0002305148,0.0003280563,0.0001799947,0.0003024561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994186,0.000130372,0.00003601626,0.0003014591,0.00004821303,0.00006535367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001412652,0.001423763,0.7602724,0.0001016802,0.00008756534,0.001524577,0.05227004,0.0167151,0.0194949,0.04179544,0.0928313,0.01334201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003279429,0.0006870822,0.06361284,0.0003752246,0.000007977428,0.0006580059,0.002511326,0.6658614,0.1672881,0.009676244,0.08375648,0.002285815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.840107,0.00007197428,0.1011085,0.0004224795,0.0002356141,0.0001431281,0.000001018139,0.000349049,0.05756122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927613,0.000001741526,0.00466057,0.0002540144,0.00001156308,0.000006646617,0.000001259112,0.000005479304,0.002297443],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6966595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4153014,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05191201595156635,"score_gpt":0.2530656985680922,"score_spread":0.2011536826165258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}