{"id":"W2118543618","doi":"10.1093/treephys/26.7.845","title":"A comparative analysis of simulated and observed photosynthetic CO2 uptake in two coniferous forest canopies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tree Physiology","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; European Commission","keywords":"Canopy; Environmental science; Atmospheric sciences; Flux (metallurgy); Photosynthesis; Tree canopy; Carbon dioxide; Botany; Ecology; Biology; Physics; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004065612,0.00008777926,0.0003132902,0.00007215736,0.00002403243,0.000003795535,0.00007144839,0.0000319821,0.00008360756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002124189,0.00007448456,0.0000392631,0.000352629,0.0002041254,0.00003660475,0.00004648704,0.00005105607,0.000006963628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003089986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003869632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01149217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09684251,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993856,0.00005041257,0.0001958399,0.000173761,0.00005571456,0.0001386504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997129,0.00007411494,0.00007188028,0.0001163905,0.000004736802,0.00001996353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003015028,0.0000574974,0.2848809,0.000001514415,0.00005581102,0.000002209126,0.0001511929,0.6246238,0.0899431,0.0002020664,0.000002806604,0.00004891394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002635076,0.0000224811,0.6637849,0.000001939741,0.0000656932,6.327486e-7,0.00001482874,0.3346814,0.0004359269,0.0006551389,0.00001930634,0.00005424641],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983266,0.00002531903,0.00001245656,0.00001151269,0.00001035493,0.00008956261,0.00003310508,0.000009266778,0.001481846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997437,0.000005345769,0.00005930782,0.00001162644,0.000002363641,0.000004078245,0.00008826008,0.000002664688,0.00008266621],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.378904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01719281291430051,"score_gpt":0.2422299827127848,"score_spread":0.2250371697984843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}