{"id":"W2118543618","doi":"10.1093/treephys/26.7.845","title":"A comparative analysis of simulated and observed photosynthetic CO2 uptake in two coniferous forest canopies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tree Physiology","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; European Commission","keywords":"Canopy; Environmental science; Atmospheric sciences; Flux (metallurgy); Photosynthesis; Tree canopy; Carbon dioxide; Botany; Ecology; Biology; Physics; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003331927,0.0005658511,0.0002899994,0.0003553229,0.0003248893,0.0004134735,0.000436578,0.0004754281,0.0003945743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007983913,0.0001544343,0.0003421686,0.000446111,0.0002337684,0.0002709383,0.0001475327,0.0001731686,0.00005813727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001127055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003794974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04826896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04400237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998733,0.00002373879,0.00000659506,0.00004458041,0.00002152674,0.00003022111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994724,0.0003399199,0.00002928319,0.0000324246,0.00008163798,0.00004429754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000846323,0.0003344205,0.1764031,0.00009891793,0.0001918745,0.0002675879,0.0001868454,0.7897234,0.01989454,0.0003010291,0.0002797965,0.01147209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006965509,0.0004003223,0.2376633,0.000007110797,0.00006907625,0.00007174749,0.0001449019,0.7527304,0.008335764,0.0001364871,0.0003430473,0.00002822981],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993862,0.00001042347,0.0001903194,0.00000495592,7.149301e-7,0.000003396945,0.00008747019,0.000022525,0.0002938575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994124,0.000009495887,0.000257424,0.000002660962,4.53207e-7,0.000006216244,0.0002378082,0.00000630582,0.0000672329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04826896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09597605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01719281291430051,"score_gpt":0.2422299827127848,"score_spread":0.2250371697984843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}