{"id":"W2118612472","doi":"10.1007/s11069-013-1013-3","title":"The optimal rotation of a flammable forest stand when both carbon sequestration and timber are valued: a multi-criteria approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Hazards","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Flammable liquid; Carbon sequestration; Natural hazard; Environmental science; Rotation (mathematics); Hydrogeology; Natural resource economics; Engineering; Waste management; Computer science; Geography; Geotechnical engineering; Ecology; Economics; Carbon dioxide; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004149478,0.001941173,0.00306112,0.003187017,0.001041449,0.003944105,0.002352673,0.004727646,0.00590701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006877079,0.001951137,0.001590595,0.002097237,0.002243527,0.003238884,0.0017325,0.001907502,0.0003833612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002807543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002780755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01194389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009004603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982625,0.0009404859,0.00006681868,0.0002168866,0.0001598106,0.0003535952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970049,0.00197074,0.0003127191,0.00006117371,0.0002351188,0.0004154067],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001595371,0.00009547223,0.0008833811,0.00008894078,0.00008363775,0.0002101626,0.00004577637,0.9859177,0.0008738458,0.004838473,0.0006751256,0.006127972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003691814,0.0001629235,0.0006455155,0.00003468591,0.0000380569,0.00003355733,0.000106477,0.9927135,0.0002875795,0.005483185,0.0004324043,0.0000251969],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4374333,0.002140092,0.5257382,0.0035699,0.0002845487,0.0008778186,0.001292882,0.0003843843,0.02827885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.942164,0.0004223681,0.05288489,0.0001407443,0.0001008093,0.0002449934,0.0002562391,0.00009384065,0.00369196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01194389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02374876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01048081719027405,"score_gpt":0.2443654012792678,"score_spread":0.2338845840889938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}