{"id":"W2118612472","doi":"10.1007/s11069-013-1013-3","title":"The optimal rotation of a flammable forest stand when both carbon sequestration and timber are valued: a multi-criteria approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Hazards","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Flammable liquid; Carbon sequestration; Natural hazard; Environmental science; Rotation (mathematics); Hydrogeology; Natural resource economics; Engineering; Waste management; Computer science; Geography; Geotechnical engineering; Ecology; Economics; Carbon dioxide; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003344667,0.0001056741,0.00009918458,0.00002155138,0.0001184362,0.00006594609,0.0001179872,0.00005086189,0.00003628457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000400617,0.00007226939,0.00002722051,0.0000787967,0.0001496726,0.0001909176,0.0000824026,0.00009534557,0.00001021611],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004943568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005903518,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007038582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003587642,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992043,0.0000675605,0.0001437799,0.0001729469,0.0002325078,0.0001789175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996752,0.00002473592,0.00009816767,0.0001540763,0.0000101598,0.00003772852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001745741,0.0006243319,0.6129091,0.0009877917,0.0003747745,0.0000193933,0.01832332,0.1048634,0.02434976,0.02286256,0.07960709,0.1333328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004807327,0.00006572591,0.1333371,0.00001344224,0.00001956763,0.000002346997,0.00004741492,0.8619091,0.0001333948,0.0003414805,0.00353156,0.0001182047],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870133,0.00009697909,0.0004997712,0.0001463512,0.00008925477,0.0002834839,0.000003903098,0.00002257817,0.01184431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899585,0.00001331982,0.005645717,0.0000323659,0.00005762336,0.00001553665,0.00001216718,0.000009402912,0.004255383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7570457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.294706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01048081719027405,"score_gpt":0.2443654012792678,"score_spread":0.2338845840889938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}