{"id":"W2118650248","doi":"10.1139/cjm-2013-0016","title":"Bioinformatic evaluation of the secondary metabolism of antistaphylococcal environmental bacterial isolates","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Microbiology","topic":"Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Biology; Actinobacteria; Staphylococcus aureus; Organism; Microbiology; Lytic cycle; Antibiotics; Metagenomics; Nonribosomal peptide; Bacteria; Drug discovery; Computational biology; Gene; Genetics; 16S ribosomal RNA; Bioinformatics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003659963,0.0003443635,0.0004567465,0.001747036,0.0004288004,0.0006610372,0.0001915672,0.0002354043,0.001432069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008719898,0.0001022505,0.0006096898,0.001776072,0.000216813,0.0002612152,0.0003179059,0.0003454807,0.0005648655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000277053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003998025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001621648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00262726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996331,0.00005040063,0.00003962977,0.0001234442,0.0001030924,0.000050268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993441,0.000194737,0.0001785936,0.00003296618,0.0001632093,0.00008646242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009315073,0.0002184117,0.05468567,0.0005525381,0.00009623839,0.0005751682,0.0003981014,0.001040521,0.9121373,0.0002053857,0.0004704273,0.02868867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005203357,0.001447641,0.5864828,0.00009316892,0.0004832649,0.003266983,0.001269488,0.02065888,0.3730038,0.0006114741,0.01253514,0.00009544242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801714,0.0008820482,0.00552823,0.0001916081,0.00002141257,0.0001118862,0.01113364,0.0002302158,0.001729668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437015,0.0009711431,0.0313528,0.0001688444,0.00002768564,0.0001470812,0.02185104,0.0001040194,0.001675974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001747036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004790723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00866904339734379,"score_gpt":0.1982156923136086,"score_spread":0.1895466489162648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}