{"id":"W2118676651","doi":"10.1017/s1431927605510729","title":"Testing Win X-ray, a Monte Carlo Program for X-ray Microanalysis in the Scanning Electron Microscope","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Microscopy and Microanalysis","topic":"Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Microanalysis; Monte Carlo method; Scanning electron microscope; Electron probe microanalysis; X-ray; Materials science; Electron microscope; Microscope; Microscopy; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Computer science; Optics; Physics; Chemistry; Mathematics; Chromatography; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00219744,0.000671513,0.0009957112,0.0006061775,0.0007751369,0.0008179235,0.001010783,0.0002482901,0.0000693554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001577782,0.0005327158,0.0004063445,0.001775288,0.0003376366,0.0004419416,0.0001437432,0.0005095133,0.00002708949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003075256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001501871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001191134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001965808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954532,0.0003261232,0.001031579,0.001279433,0.0003504146,0.00155919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998071,0.0003296991,0.0004147516,0.0008185225,0.00020885,0.0001571329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001239867,0.0003360863,0.002652925,0.00005627439,0.0001161397,0.000007419866,0.001115735,0.0001691272,0.9874227,0.00003986179,0.001754772,0.006204949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009676761,0.0005744568,0.001376615,0.0001130682,0.0007547321,0.00003539282,0.0004994099,0.002045544,0.9674861,0.00009761596,0.02529567,0.0007537137],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868666,0.007253295,0.002340384,0.001350026,0.00005328349,0.001497614,0.0000588511,0.000323332,0.0002565985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8236964,0.0002182898,0.1733073,0.001155351,0.0002276636,0.0006455276,0.0000368545,0.00007789242,0.0006347091],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.170967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01302157898730415,"score_gpt":0.3022000246639976,"score_spread":0.2891784456766934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}