{"id":"W2118788859","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.013","title":"Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Medicine; Adverse effect; MEDLINE; Meta-analysis; Data extraction; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2932998,0.003624364,0.01018899,0.02545588,0.001102642,0.007717241,0.004137043,0.005763798,0.004873551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4968835,0.00280745,0.02497275,0.02260474,0.002296599,0.009082483,0.005095932,0.006292239,0.0008741598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01172854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02126184,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0623185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1545169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8250519,0.06136083,0.07505068,0.01427281,0.02227811,0.001985657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2692158,0.5432494,0.08415958,0.02231826,0.07808755,0.002969414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00360268,0.0001441643,0.0650531,0.3359908,0.06602803,0.0003303334,0.001341826,0.002833991,0.001226585,0.00403588,0.0350159,0.4843967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001497254,0.002111532,0.4139673,0.244783,0.14077,0.002477134,0.001335302,0.00177007,0.002773012,0.005277475,0.182642,0.0005959999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004131973,0.9687437,0.004329538,0.01539939,0.002646691,0.0001258686,0.003345799,0.0001568263,0.00112015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1505541,0.749574,0.05491252,0.02685167,0.00635283,0.0005676579,0.009473265,0.0003047819,0.00140913],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7067002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8714872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8816318847741158,"score_gpt":0.6463443115375861,"score_spread":0.2352875732365297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}