{"id":"W2118790735","doi":"10.1186/1475-2875-13-11","title":"Assessing the optimal virulence of malaria‐targeting mosquito pathogens: a mathematical study of engineered Metarhizium anisopliae","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Malaria Journal","topic":"Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences","keywords":"Metarhizium anisopliae; Metarhizium; Virulence; Biology; Pathogen; Entomopathogenic fungus; Fungus; Population; Malaria; Pathogenic fungus; Microbiology; Virology; Biological pest control; Ecology; Immunology; Botany; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003512447,0.0002282374,0.0004967646,0.00002853477,0.000299809,0.0002018194,0.0007993085,0.0001155387,0.0006214136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000874175,0.00008232142,0.0002011649,0.0003273511,0.00008185588,0.0002540186,0.0001948509,0.0004405748,0.000008943229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002601539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002272563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001809906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009089387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972036,0.0006286891,0.0009109868,0.0002679653,0.0005959808,0.0003928089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981564,0.0006970183,0.0006016821,0.0001639466,0.0002628842,0.0001181255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002943828,0.0004181456,0.002852751,0.00001551214,0.00008659806,0.00001249124,0.0005809639,0.0003202133,0.9891755,0.001420803,0.00003155406,0.005056024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005807971,0.008328354,0.6974625,0.0007038968,0.002145466,0.002166525,0.03559082,0.04070412,0.193311,0.009497155,0.002175468,0.002106779],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955302,0.0002392736,0.002929885,0.0005632422,0.0002366662,0.0003158957,0.00001188656,0.0000241439,0.0001487805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992731,0.00001167307,0.006752322,0.00005152018,0.0004141493,0.000008778788,0.000002611536,0.000004232143,0.00002367931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7958645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6804043,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01646036340104941,"score_gpt":0.2461197411408338,"score_spread":0.2296593777397844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}