{"id":"W2118996267","doi":"10.1017/s0266462306051051","title":"Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: A systematic literature review","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":299,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Quality-adjusted life year; MEDLINE; CINAHL; Cochrane Library; Systematic review; Quality of life (healthcare); Economic evaluation; Family medicine; Cost effectiveness; Psychological intervention; Surgery; Randomized controlled trial; Psychiatry; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06680141,0.002734812,0.01826846,0.03632915,0.001055146,0.005856351,0.003084513,0.002815759,0.003769584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.204948,0.002188127,0.0186152,0.02636161,0.002049375,0.006718418,0.002681636,0.002246788,0.000319119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01264668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02193399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006475216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01475176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.908729,0.03948577,0.03235136,0.004173186,0.0143631,0.0008975526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7994174,0.1473384,0.03739138,0.002247663,0.01273003,0.0008751796],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002575313,0.00002312258,0.002281684,0.9359022,0.02478294,0.00008119827,0.0001948561,0.0002375839,0.00007120198,0.0003285053,0.0008021973,0.03503713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003880213,0.0003192308,0.005555439,0.8888966,0.09586924,0.0004001688,0.0003459323,0.0003916415,0.0001272766,0.0005761043,0.007054264,0.00007608436],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009159522,0.9967011,0.000473042,0.0003104206,0.0001568014,0.0008487796,0.0004026698,0.00001257599,0.0001787021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04157862,0.9475114,0.004758841,0.0008022935,0.0002335685,0.004543621,0.0004625331,0.00001467392,0.00009442204],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9331986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3532839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2922262180588633,"score_gpt":0.541683128796948,"score_spread":0.2494569107380847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}