{"id":"W2119203085","doi":"10.1017/s0008423909090039","title":"The Unanimous Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada as a Test of the Attitudinal Model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unanimity; Supreme court; Voting; Test (biology); Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008574271,0.0002261049,0.0003847936,0.001542494,0.009995043,0.005863662,0.001357224,0.001201718,0.006000631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03888945,0.0001519738,0.0003342047,0.002481767,0.01008823,0.001897025,0.001979044,0.002642741,0.0002171329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04279588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04469476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9499134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9570537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9897175,0.002426473,0.0002248614,0.0007970684,0.004078072,0.00275602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722383,0.01380368,0.003248031,0.001043368,0.007715685,0.001950991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003244347,0.0003812894,0.4121213,0.0001677901,0.0001328568,0.0006660216,0.05896991,0.005709264,0.0006126098,0.4727483,0.01133469,0.03683149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001090747,0.0002589128,0.6793972,0.0004476334,0.0001694543,0.00014032,0.1735616,0.02089292,0.001144024,0.07997727,0.04367721,0.0002244003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8784359,0.0003364893,0.001163315,0.006311647,0.00005990948,0.0001142358,0.0002987224,0.000008064519,0.1132718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979563,0.00008203914,0.0001561884,0.0002335912,0.00000831352,0.00001225651,0.00004014442,0.000001545455,0.001509724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05008662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3105073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03291715511497402,"score_gpt":0.2934792108388698,"score_spread":0.2605620557238958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}