{"id":"W2119250803","doi":"10.1016/j.jconhyd.2005.01.004","title":"Prediction of two-phase capillary pressure–saturation relationships in fractional wettability systems","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Contaminant Hydrology","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Imbibition; Capillary pressure; Wetting; Saturation (graph theory); Porous medium; Scaling; Capillary action; Geotechnical engineering; Relative permeability; Petroleum engineering; Mechanics; Materials science; Geology; Porosity; Mathematics; Physics; Geometry; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001211553,0.0001020443,0.0002942141,0.0001278364,0.00008522014,0.000009786419,0.0001134203,0.0000991635,0.0001238402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001164999,0.00008502961,0.00006648991,0.0001371627,0.0001262171,0.0005908543,0.00003698876,0.0002970141,0.00001811368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001688431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002595363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001548884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004108719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998215,0.0003439778,0.0008270702,0.0001391439,0.0003256186,0.0001491523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989914,0.000198355,0.0005695229,0.0001166019,0.00007595712,0.00004811821],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004505745,0.0007888585,0.9008086,0.00002799564,0.0001057464,0.00002341252,0.002071763,0.04705824,0.03572851,0.0009182853,0.001051397,0.01096657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003944744,0.0006518639,0.9005081,0.0000335936,0.0001096931,0.0003250152,0.0003231752,0.03626972,0.001723971,0.0001911396,0.05579474,0.0001242332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844077,0.0005771174,0.01332246,0.000624697,0.0004284387,0.0001660352,0.000008886796,0.000005901726,0.0004588093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991833,0.00003875188,0.0001697829,0.00003300162,0.0001489743,0.000008674644,0.000005089493,0.000005119358,0.0004073221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05474334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3467407,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02319920605104118,"score_gpt":0.2589336357231983,"score_spread":0.2357344296721572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}