{"id":"W211925862","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-07467-2_51","title":"Considering Multiple Instances of Items in Combinatorial Reverse Auctions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Combinatorial auction; Crossover; Operator (biology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Procurement; Reverse auction; Mathematical optimization; Genetic algorithm; Quality (philosophy); Common value auction; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002735098,0.000249353,0.0005400244,0.001007579,0.000217721,0.0001444593,0.001353448,0.0002257381,0.00009649056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001649696,0.0002146499,0.0001137026,0.0009934043,0.001459297,0.0002672254,0.0003452058,0.0005172584,0.00005760606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001233441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002594304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003628082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003578533,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966615,0.00008337774,0.0009553776,0.0009238112,0.001095413,0.0002805366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949422,0.003113297,0.0005737477,0.0009386369,0.0003403372,0.00009172771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004935402,0.00009017387,0.002887009,0.00002713931,0.0000109888,0.00001404613,0.001968271,0.1397192,0.0007850145,0.4627983,0.0002632307,0.3913873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003945677,0.00005399013,0.000252651,0.0001916056,0.000004252158,0.00001530487,0.000004979909,0.02636856,0.001112483,0.9551114,0.01620597,0.0002842363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002989437,0.00009400012,0.987708,0.000420362,0.003083448,0.0003281019,0.00001483337,0.00003497535,0.005326837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796691,0.0000148623,0.01923579,0.0002112612,0.0003445113,0.00001121673,0.000002181018,0.00001414751,0.0004969163],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9766797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.875317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05694815604600356,"score_gpt":0.320722494236504,"score_spread":0.2637743381905004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}