{"id":"W211925862","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-07467-2_51","title":"Considering Multiple Instances of Items in Combinatorial Reverse Auctions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Combinatorial auction; Crossover; Operator (biology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Procurement; Reverse auction; Mathematical optimization; Genetic algorithm; Quality (philosophy); Common value auction; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005119873,0.002025824,0.004973595,0.001335626,0.001718725,0.008346803,0.007092461,0.005779076,0.01153462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02199488,0.003438388,0.003769901,0.003700104,0.00226342,0.01189252,0.003211571,0.006033394,0.0009848784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002082668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001174428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003006276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003133954,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954098,0.002205693,0.0002073002,0.0007792918,0.00069949,0.0006984198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856208,0.01133043,0.000797834,0.0008738975,0.0006800665,0.0006970415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006875434,0.0003493403,0.002029484,0.0005511349,0.0004163066,0.002422431,0.0002743676,0.6871141,0.001068111,0.2735228,0.005985432,0.02557893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000516484,0.00005878924,0.0002217191,0.00004193419,0.00009999927,0.0003787261,0.0001561057,0.8313105,0.0002260841,0.1663357,0.001084664,0.00003410178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2623089,0.001959866,0.6876186,0.002617797,0.000512479,0.000280311,0.0004595992,0.0002594602,0.04398305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.805455,0.001355264,0.1628476,0.0003546786,0.0007478477,0.0002264877,0.000692061,0.0003808197,0.02794018],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01153462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03858721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05694815604600356,"score_gpt":0.320722494236504,"score_spread":0.2637743381905004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}