{"id":"W2119288488","doi":"10.1017/s0032247402002759","title":"Views of traditional ecological knowledge in co-management bodies in Nunavik, Quebec","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polar Record","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Traditional knowledge; Documentation; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Resource (disambiguation); Ecology; Environmental resource management; Position (finance); Geography; Business; Sociology; Environmental science; Social science; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001014362,0.0001141334,0.0003786017,0.0001621546,0.0004480059,0.000001605599,0.0001016612,0.0001557733,0.001914195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009784316,0.00009910943,0.00005624895,0.0001350544,0.00005764216,0.00003853835,0.00005482394,0.0003807642,0.0004443639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005989413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001955753,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01585297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7403727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979095,0.0005808966,0.0005886929,0.0001956708,0.00006808674,0.0006571778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992918,0.0003751536,0.0001233148,0.0001243387,0.00004308424,0.0000422643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004559984,0.001171752,0.9208475,0.0003531044,0.00003818503,0.00003200233,0.02388329,0.000004009679,0.00001085196,0.03831554,0.01164142,0.003656681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000887282,0.0001423954,0.6457837,0.0000709201,0.000007556491,8.463248e-7,0.01257973,0.00000961505,0.000004244921,0.002440747,0.3379518,0.0001211035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7768819,0.0005096703,0.000008893233,0.0002496293,0.0006574406,0.000748593,0.00001974767,0.00001347951,0.2209107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936271,0.0006196999,0.0005572563,0.0004243793,0.00008053271,0.000351904,0.00002076458,0.00001287408,0.004305494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7245198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989982,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1179034092575392,"score_gpt":0.3969602890674282,"score_spread":0.279056879809889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}