{"id":"W2119312886","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2001.tb00296.x","title":"An Economic Analysis of the Returns to Canadian Swine Research: 1974–97","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Policy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Economics; Rate of return; Econometrics; Partial equilibrium; Robustness (evolution); Agricultural economics; Internal rate of return; General equilibrium theory; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001529175,0.0004012874,0.0003065536,0.003114564,0.00137471,0.001988935,0.0009917897,0.0003540839,0.003331341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005722325,0.0003412816,0.0008189424,0.005478747,0.0006446458,0.0005711839,0.0005704405,0.0008163521,0.0003050911],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0862634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02676111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981781,0.0001561841,0.00004476551,0.0001190809,0.001120442,0.0003813955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967344,0.0007776608,0.0004264028,0.0001184905,0.001753486,0.0001895351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002065054,0.0002551674,0.3552855,0.0009240814,0.001326759,0.00178147,0.001381475,0.287573,0.002594148,0.1036997,0.04805081,0.1950629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000889065,0.0002163846,0.7363795,0.0001294083,0.00048176,0.0002930256,0.001878701,0.1443751,0.003547616,0.004595084,0.107822,0.0001925016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8591133,0.006144807,0.006311541,0.004141875,0.00006918874,0.0002757359,0.0318591,0.0001625282,0.09192189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730284,0.003371259,0.002116777,0.0001366166,0.00001972036,0.00003640875,0.007165669,0.00003320408,0.01409196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6258876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06862715861677017,"score_gpt":0.2285369767569091,"score_spread":0.1599098181401389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}