{"id":"W2119479424","doi":"10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1093","title":"Communicating Qualitative Research Study Designs to Research Ethics Review Boards","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Qualitative Report","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Research ethics; Qualitative research; Engineering ethics; Context (archaeology); Institutional review board; Agency (philosophy); Mandate; Research design; Sociology; Information ethics; Case study research; Management science; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Social science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.738732,0.001641919,0.002514288,0.007616685,0.01732309,0.02151726,0.005974947,0.012346,0.008703663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8248232,0.003321045,0.002422127,0.007094413,0.02355339,0.02372848,0.02352896,0.01953846,0.005129471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02027821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07274605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003225322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004305418,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1242376,0.7911845,0.04693592,0.005964589,0.0281334,0.003544008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07939992,0.7036833,0.04780413,0.05805491,0.1012311,0.009826692],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004480527,0.0003728367,0.004212782,0.003797576,0.0001742503,0.001406873,0.6123253,0.001718722,0.006934909,0.1095032,0.06053712,0.1985683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006855422,0.0007429124,0.002771457,0.01200314,0.0001666378,0.001319839,0.206012,0.005472465,0.009579014,0.2077585,0.5527055,0.0007830198],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0337516,0.003459477,0.6091958,0.2939378,0.0101623,0.01558568,0.0002946298,0.001129326,0.03248326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.227355,0.005109117,0.676752,0.04133098,0.003468653,0.03624641,0.0003232483,0.000701844,0.008712817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9434251406002533,"score_gpt":0.844041874710059,"score_spread":0.0993832658901943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}