{"id":"W2119621443","doi":"","title":"Evaluation of alternative methods for using LiDAR to predict aboveground biomass in mixed species and structurally complex forests in northeastern North America","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences (MCFNS)","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Lidar; Ranging; Remote sensing; Range (aeronautics); Environmental science; Calibration; Random forest; Extraction (chemistry); Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Geography; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007054537,0.0009643311,0.0005847026,0.0009914374,0.0004558316,0.001003076,0.001516106,0.0006518709,0.0004381114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007046999,0.0004040466,0.0009708646,0.0008412905,0.0003657729,0.00152826,0.0007757214,0.000638334,0.0001343234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001415588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001091549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04098281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09052463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985833,0.0006163153,0.00008780344,0.0004406275,0.0002117297,0.00006009258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996532,0.002126127,0.0004383931,0.0002269051,0.0005789044,0.00009773317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004148502,0.0004604264,0.5631086,0.0001795206,0.0004783212,0.0001209454,0.0003928828,0.3295047,0.005608326,0.0005249552,0.0002980054,0.09890851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003718561,0.0003303633,0.1832228,0.00003586721,0.0001022538,0.00005218682,0.0003451614,0.8128634,0.002271455,0.000343881,0.0003449755,0.00005044185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807474,0.0001564847,0.01810908,0.0000762789,0.000007262868,0.00004901985,0.0002311111,0.0002116875,0.0004116707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677645,0.00008936344,0.03121366,0.00002046686,0.000005876057,0.0000788543,0.0005832351,0.00003195538,0.0002120533],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04098281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08148855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07148618717450618,"score_gpt":0.3548986956995437,"score_spread":0.2834125085250375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}