{"id":"W2119651215","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.009","title":"Assessing critical habitat: Evaluating the relative contribution of habitats to population persistence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Population; Ecology; Population viability analysis; Habitat destruction; Biology; Geography; Endangered species; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001379074,0.00009765293,0.0001282301,0.00002167573,0.0003626465,0.00003359419,0.0001518365,0.000172158,0.0002974105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009124087,0.00006668213,0.00005208621,0.0002844502,0.0003510785,0.0004880938,0.00008578095,0.0002298745,0.00007883165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005909841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001731561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000145468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003330044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987155,0.0003193842,0.0003185603,0.0002593048,0.0002045892,0.0001826817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981103,0.001421854,0.000146615,0.0001643988,0.000103882,0.00005296863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000432377,0.00003259238,0.9168253,0.000001502906,0.000003396757,3.072296e-7,0.00008434376,0.00004049429,0.06981974,0.01086431,0.0001235916,0.002161198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001244382,0.0002500118,0.9843664,0.00001045139,0.00001396775,0.000003244701,0.00007344742,0.004694559,0.0004054562,0.00986151,0.0001062885,0.00009023522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828853,0.000006275455,0.004445809,0.01160141,0.0002422556,0.0003362869,0.000002777411,0.00003314345,0.0004467143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907752,5.506215e-7,0.007157519,0.001927158,0.00003918814,0.00004393991,0.00003200167,0.000003545146,0.00002095354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06941428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09759210132118731,"score_gpt":0.353785769039582,"score_spread":0.2561936677183947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}