{"id":"W2119651215","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.009","title":"Assessing critical habitat: Evaluating the relative contribution of habitats to population persistence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Population; Ecology; Population viability analysis; Habitat destruction; Biology; Geography; Endangered species; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003811552,0.0006154429,0.0006499209,0.003278548,0.0004612516,0.001377962,0.0007869019,0.0009642532,0.00140113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02524549,0.0002420027,0.0006572939,0.001591912,0.0008785236,0.001974457,0.001293933,0.0005026808,0.0001508717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005249319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005342845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004043309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009588093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986423,0.0006761195,0.0001027883,0.0002017224,0.0002722971,0.000104892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842939,0.01178192,0.002014977,0.0006544581,0.0006257509,0.0006289578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003998918,0.0001317657,0.9296331,0.0000903306,0.0005810739,0.0000927712,0.0001691468,0.01682033,0.00122247,0.0006572183,0.0002446908,0.04995722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000495629,0.001530501,0.8724799,0.00006007518,0.0007198157,0.0008130812,0.0008736646,0.1114085,0.001583951,0.00972704,0.0006810011,0.00007296386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928161,0.0004115427,0.005525776,0.00008696836,0.000009656416,0.00002307044,0.0002295416,0.00002481971,0.0008725065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967714,0.0001018844,0.002790682,0.00001269972,0.000007850589,0.00001396656,0.0001789299,0.00000591996,0.0001166046],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004043309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02015764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09759210132118731,"score_gpt":0.353785769039582,"score_spread":0.2561936677183947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}