{"id":"W2119656009","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.50.5.559","title":"Revisiting Selection and Influence: An Inquiry into the Friendship Networks of High School Students and Their Association with Delinquency","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Juvenile delinquency; Selection (genetic algorithm); Similarity (geometry); Psychology; Association (psychology); Variation (astronomy); Social psychology; Process (computing); Criminology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002411775,0.00022958,0.0004074629,0.0003420402,0.00123747,0.0001447739,0.000419364,0.0003682022,0.00004818774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00374013,0.0001910224,0.00006198903,0.0001471778,0.001069224,0.0005193185,0.00004499731,0.0009162632,4.958607e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006526724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00164977,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08022515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1912896,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973624,0.000857148,0.000542323,0.0002920939,0.0001316063,0.0008144568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965742,0.0009101247,0.000589989,0.0001654127,0.0008160315,0.0009442825],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003428528,0.0001039397,0.432309,0.001249896,0.0003884075,0.0008099711,0.4876154,0.002482255,0.000507925,0.04808072,0.000287964,0.02582159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005887219,0.0008545706,0.6096756,0.0003879729,0.003045998,0.002436543,0.3800078,0.0002869478,0.00006773697,0.001840598,0.000507228,0.0003002585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940401,0.00188926,0.001788588,0.001698257,0.0002122787,0.0001481296,0.000006895253,0.00001277594,0.0002037595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995713,0.002290611,0.0007670499,0.000701778,0.0004492386,0.0000101702,0.000003767468,0.00001853511,0.00004583854],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1773666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9517741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09909662525941157,"score_gpt":0.3498548228251711,"score_spread":0.2507581975657595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}