{"id":"W2119668913","doi":"10.5558/tfc83393-3","title":"Tree species of concern in New Brunswick, Canada. I. Current status and threats","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Plant and Fungal Interactions Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Threatened species; Beech; Biology; Geography; Ecology; Conservation status; Habitat; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003296369,0.0002501992,0.0001693373,0.002537461,0.00286317,0.001063641,0.0007591702,0.0002404603,0.003215648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004827832,0.0001623441,0.0001832834,0.004050874,0.0004797758,0.0003449265,0.000556698,0.000403773,0.0003395074],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03215402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03529998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999689,0.00001198154,0.00002108962,0.00003871428,0.0001176491,0.0001216032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999069,0.00003891927,0.0001243032,0.00001310356,0.0005548152,0.0001999271],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001740685,0.00005095863,0.7654447,0.0009994606,0.00007728994,0.00168517,0.006911038,0.0006678991,0.007103117,0.003158302,0.03427703,0.179451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009937728,0.00002195614,0.9266229,0.0002279721,0.000029672,0.0003408981,0.006469984,0.0003169124,0.0004841363,0.0001973676,0.06525293,0.00002533656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8503703,0.02867431,0.00116562,0.006618169,0.000178037,0.0004704036,0.03862522,0.0001692749,0.07372872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.934899,0.008494915,0.003972401,0.001232763,0.00002501309,0.000162932,0.0109956,0.00002531381,0.04019201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03215402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2332948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03142066938746159,"score_gpt":0.3086927479695339,"score_spread":0.2772720785820723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}