{"id":"W2119716989","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.04.003","title":"Understanding pre-dialysis modality decision-making: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","topic":"Dialysis and Renal Disease Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre; University of Alberta; Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Quality of life (healthcare); Qualitative research; Dialysis; Modality (human–computer interaction); Medicine; Kidney disease; Intrusiveness; Modalities; Psychology; Intensive care medicine; Nursing; Social psychology; Surgery; Sociology; Computer science; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0973676,0.002380982,0.01029758,0.008108605,0.001655909,0.005428825,0.003405756,0.001773912,0.0039071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2435012,0.001995078,0.01408773,0.0099399,0.001749316,0.0056856,0.004376199,0.002888782,0.0002054468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01284162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02562765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01859694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04807214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9373357,0.03756886,0.01569089,0.002665186,0.00552543,0.001214026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7004947,0.2661363,0.0156398,0.00422885,0.01252763,0.0009727264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001101665,0.0001091874,0.006158216,0.8394306,0.06887056,0.0001447903,0.01140363,0.0005063396,0.0002828931,0.0008863655,0.001145513,0.0699602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007292684,0.0004749877,0.009232792,0.7347019,0.2209501,0.0002681153,0.01616054,0.0003225996,0.0007973337,0.002613818,0.01360539,0.0001431131],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02079921,0.9667382,0.004615968,0.002272042,0.0003440619,0.002769883,0.001578576,0.0000210023,0.0008610232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3058212,0.6649943,0.01649758,0.002771172,0.0001532707,0.008366241,0.0009731061,0.00004078961,0.0003823629],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0973676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5149353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6871357009717248,"score_gpt":0.5875844095698809,"score_spread":0.09955129140184393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}