{"id":"W2119760912","doi":"10.1109/iccie.2009.5223922","title":"A rolling horizon solution approach for the airline crew pairing problem","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Group for Research in Decision Analysis","funders":"","keywords":"Crew scheduling; Crew; Column generation; Computer science; Pairing; Schedule; Scheduling (production processes); Mathematical optimization; Heuristic; Job shop scheduling; Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Time horizon; Operations research; Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Aeronautics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007655093,0.0007321949,0.0007567068,0.0004944192,0.0004076351,0.0005680145,0.0007659488,0.0006931158,0.004861914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001157163,0.0003568629,0.0005938791,0.0007014995,0.0002762838,0.0005523778,0.0004598605,0.0009862666,0.0004211307],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005874711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001245852,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007981008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006842391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995911,0.0001744891,0.00001472855,0.0000679783,0.00009811801,0.00005364966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997075,0.0001605761,0.00003017552,0.00001724675,0.00006149252,0.00002293965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004305636,0.00004325246,0.000127306,0.00008106326,0.00002253911,0.0000539972,0.00003974868,0.929038,0.001450998,0.009371025,0.002016202,0.05771295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001160054,0.00004116852,0.00005729332,0.000004687147,0.000006624117,0.00001371239,0.000009922435,0.9952277,0.0003352301,0.002976088,0.001310918,0.000005050669],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004495072,0.0001771106,0.9919811,0.0001000206,0.00003123142,0.00005349427,0.00005865484,0.0001694835,0.002933848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2935222,0.0005278179,0.7006841,0.0001216126,0.00007214701,0.0003092377,0.0003180483,0.00009916989,0.004345627],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007981008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01626474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0256748682708132,"score_gpt":0.2587993696184967,"score_spread":0.2331245013476835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}