{"id":"W2119787882","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01755.x","title":"How to measure oxidative stress in an ecological context: methodological and statistical issues","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Functional Ecology","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Biology; Oxidative damage; Oxidative stress; Balance (ability); Confounding; Adaptation (eye); Risk analysis (engineering); Biochemical engineering; Ecology; Computational biology; Bioinformatics; Neuroscience; Biochemistry; Pathology; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007952069,0.0002025992,0.0003520534,0.00007149974,0.0002018823,0.0000324368,0.0001875785,0.0005126303,0.01845726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009596715,0.0001736,0.00002815101,0.0001388253,0.0009418879,0.000218444,0.0003209305,0.0006473946,0.0003609416],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001138518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000128796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002892012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01727804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978259,0.0006243211,0.0002254253,0.0006944503,0.0001588462,0.0004710876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998464,0.001003633,0.00005856997,0.0001726623,0.000008252265,0.000292863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000375466,0.001269133,0.8888305,0.000003048738,0.00001891201,0.0001047688,0.0001916354,0.0004661437,0.09050329,0.009647358,0.003591789,0.004997956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005398756,0.001475385,0.9816129,9.168108e-7,0.000009569796,0.00006774315,0.0003199787,0.0001518046,0.00196522,0.006096405,0.007549774,0.0002104658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920805,0.000007864588,0.001016265,0.004723448,0.0005569211,0.0003755706,0.00004045419,0.00003367495,0.001165356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860326,0.000004654634,0.0102343,0.002563121,0.0001127244,0.0001123358,0.00003718881,0.00001068861,0.0008924003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09278236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06266935115452386,"score_gpt":0.3051372320796641,"score_spread":0.2424678809251402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}