{"id":"W2119798167","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2004.05.002","title":"Slant or occlusion: global factors resolve stereoscopic ambiguity in sets of horizontal lines","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vision Research","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Line (geometry); Geometry; Parallel; Stereoscopy; Mathematics; Constant (computer programming); Ambiguity; Occlusion; Depth perception; Set (abstract data type); Horizontal line test; Stereopsis; Optics; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Computer science; Geology; Perception; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003517917,0.0003702572,0.0004564053,0.0005818055,0.0005771836,0.001553858,0.0005211989,0.0003952489,0.002658646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004467341,0.0003242713,0.0003221243,0.0005807223,0.000811233,0.003435458,0.00113306,0.0005805209,0.0002884139],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003330825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003504807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007080936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009658341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997279,0.00003390291,0.00001075567,0.00007308851,0.00009430039,0.0000601064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985219,0.0005249605,0.0003135871,0.0002849185,0.0001720629,0.0001825673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003327345,0.0003327217,0.0406178,0.0003888253,0.0001288107,0.0005247256,0.002406294,0.02364309,0.4656868,0.1407551,0.00411269,0.3180758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003282398,0.0009646317,0.3409452,0.0001309697,0.0002730648,0.001103948,0.002906529,0.2161358,0.1104199,0.3192703,0.007353299,0.000168178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9165814,0.0002364355,0.07289354,0.0001605912,0.00005567437,0.00001561216,0.0001120129,0.0001867014,0.009758037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922686,0.00007223218,0.006761458,0.00002783829,0.00003129728,0.000006812081,0.000131998,0.00006919419,0.0006305215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002658646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008894026,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.234015545593346,"score_gpt":0.49770960956953,"score_spread":0.2636940639761839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}