{"id":"W2119965664","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.054","title":"Risk rating for mountain pine beetle infestation of lodgepole pine forests over large areas with ordinal regression modelling","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Ecology and Management","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mountain pine beetle; Pinus contorta; Dendroctonus; Diameter at breast height; Ecology; Bark beetle; Forest ecology; Ordinal regression; Geography; Environmental science; Forestry; Ecosystem; Biology; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003899086,0.0001903022,0.0002303334,0.0001010383,0.0004933271,0.000007641677,0.0001314571,0.00009507911,0.0002053722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002142577,0.0001543166,0.00004365829,0.0001616829,0.000251493,0.0002055857,0.000253556,0.0001035391,0.00001732003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001084366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008945832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002428175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00911635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987392,0.00005395338,0.0002903285,0.0003741384,0.0001535171,0.0003888117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999368,0.00008001307,0.0002596672,0.000208396,0.00001765194,0.00006631068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004590082,0.0003659817,0.8521293,0.000128711,0.000118692,0.00005299259,0.0003114625,0.1192884,0.0000190487,0.02231346,0.004015702,0.000797162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002303957,0.0008835545,0.9141364,0.00003217033,0.0001021891,0.00001581956,0.0001213392,0.0733377,0.00004098253,0.004310532,0.004515795,0.0001996017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9169837,0.00002595708,0.07981362,0.0000804166,0.00009237549,0.001002793,0.00001605589,0.00003225036,0.001952875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900369,0.0002255521,0.008088171,0.0001566079,0.00002422345,0.0002630184,0.00007435471,0.00001805359,0.001113142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07305323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6292849,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008286001724937877,"score_gpt":0.2224250178390249,"score_spread":0.214139016114087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}