{"id":"W2120013688","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00138.x","title":"Supplier‐Switching Inertia and Competitive Asymmetry: A Demand‐Side Perspective*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Sciences","topic":"Sustainable Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Supplier relationship management; Industrial organization; Business; Perspective (graphical); Selection (genetic algorithm); Inertia; Marketing; Industrial marketing; Supply chain management; Supply chain; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001489398,0.0002016886,0.0002184897,0.0008005538,0.0006864815,0.001178849,0.0004400686,0.00004292462,0.0001406196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004380207,0.0001613593,0.00005528165,0.001513548,0.0002495539,0.001461413,0.0005507108,0.0001070459,0.0001310843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007551166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002744593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002563807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004201118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979211,0.0000142201,0.0002890439,0.0006238264,0.0007212594,0.000430541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990782,0.0003097621,0.0001605167,0.0002024673,0.0002308935,0.00001816944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002659789,0.00005581756,0.03664022,0.00002247284,0.000008475122,0.00004183144,0.00008708239,0.0005336653,0.0001475993,0.9477866,0.005299647,0.009349988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001137596,0.00004003382,0.1668646,0.0001003041,0.00005172533,0.000009645529,0.02784125,0.01912772,0.00009393822,0.6429362,0.1411609,0.0006360307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7261087,0.0006267566,0.03495653,0.00436758,0.0004530481,0.0005222733,0.000001711142,0.0001970116,0.2327664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940152,0.000008496201,0.00387557,0.001307051,0.0005123704,0.00001494951,0.000002929293,0.00001397337,0.0002494226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3048504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01111127190681852,"score_gpt":0.2542100008311687,"score_spread":0.2430987289243502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}