{"id":"W2120112981","doi":"10.1080/10256016.2012.667810","title":"Comparison of sample preparation methods for stable isotope analysis of dissolved sulphate in forested watersheds","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies","topic":"Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Stable isotope ratio; Isotope; Isotope analysis; Environmental chemistry; Environmental science; Sample preparation; Sample (material); Chemistry; Radiochemistry; Geology; Chromatography; Oceanography; Nuclear physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008139614,0.0001158149,0.0005942377,0.0001318788,0.00006839923,0.000005167197,0.00006809919,0.00003800112,0.00008151244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001723125,0.00009075429,0.00005223107,0.0001640318,0.0001234723,0.0001693424,0.00003020907,0.00005201971,5.679764e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002134246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007692342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002747935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004235289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988024,0.00008773175,0.0005361788,0.0001724531,0.000092496,0.0003087817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994315,0.000236513,0.000164318,0.0001029466,0.000005371103,0.00005937836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008401627,0.0001066479,0.9801398,0.0001837166,0.000109838,4.408444e-8,0.008670256,0.0006629296,0.0002910204,0.00000834846,0.00001197811,0.009731388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003549574,0.0002008583,0.9844612,0.00002352574,0.0000603723,1.921921e-7,0.0054804,0.004564634,0.004119046,0.0001552881,0.0004879864,0.0000914854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877906,0.01095675,0.000522624,0.00007507527,0.00005872086,0.000399919,0.0001466266,0.000003447183,0.00004622487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914857,0.001299516,0.006863819,0.00003658873,0.00001141332,0.00001786033,0.0002528642,0.000002240589,0.00002998708],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009657238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4154075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08464524192649141,"score_gpt":0.4119182925931952,"score_spread":0.3272730506667038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}