{"id":"W2120158572","doi":"10.1111/j.1559-3584.2010.00264.x","title":"High‐Level Methodologies to Evaluate Naval Task Groups","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Naval Engineers Journal","topic":"Technology Assessment and Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Metric (unit); Task (project management); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Asset (computer security); Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Task group; Systems engineering; Operations research; Engineering; Reliability engineering; Engineering management; Operations management; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00731238,0.001356624,0.0005525044,0.008444138,0.0006942585,0.003627894,0.001357816,0.0006865976,0.00533861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02057361,0.0003307986,0.0007907181,0.004882523,0.001030719,0.002266284,0.001605641,0.0006650343,0.0007792198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002386119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00235699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004753598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004196405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919081,0.00472285,0.0005369029,0.0004612576,0.002126116,0.0002446577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851161,0.007369868,0.00242722,0.001007138,0.003773094,0.0003065671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001378488,0.0003456998,0.02026073,0.0008169128,0.0003537771,0.0001547447,0.0009083144,0.4203879,0.003305731,0.1515074,0.004457762,0.3973632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004768449,0.0002886136,0.006199632,0.0002794033,0.00007991904,0.0000814719,0.0009389999,0.8956162,0.003462609,0.08184316,0.01111206,0.00005028609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02654341,0.0003462189,0.959933,0.000135366,0.00003856563,0.0005471909,0.0004544556,0.0004680461,0.01153382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3671702,0.0002733704,0.6287472,0.00004992132,0.00002802395,0.0009725338,0.0008182757,0.00006928206,0.001871281],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008444138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03867209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0878323031918349,"score_gpt":0.2951153659175436,"score_spread":0.2072830627257087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}