{"id":"W2120162476","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2010.01.005","title":"An empirical study on measuring the relative efficiency using DEA method: A case study of bank industry","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Banking industry; Data envelopment analysis; Empirical research; Efficiency; Econometrics; Business; Computer science; Industrial organization; Statistics; Operations management; Economics; Mathematics; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005487411,0.0004026566,0.0005631867,0.002128885,0.0005382526,0.0006567567,0.0004853529,0.0006950996,0.0008052806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01660104,0.0001512001,0.0003779522,0.003304735,0.0005775049,0.001271343,0.0003831303,0.0005071589,0.0001658693],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004625974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002291049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002541491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002476281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978683,0.001211651,0.0001584934,0.0002350616,0.0004306849,0.00009583663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812511,0.01486421,0.001054208,0.001013306,0.001707126,0.0001100586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006261044,0.001693335,0.4590196,0.0008112185,0.0005185286,0.001856497,0.004296185,0.0659394,0.02523211,0.01799195,0.001956105,0.420059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007527543,0.001230577,0.4678018,0.0001947122,0.0003218889,0.002399052,0.006842693,0.4699539,0.03826018,0.006583143,0.006176021,0.0001608098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711619,0.0004914364,0.02603657,0.0001049582,0.000006150059,0.00003321284,0.0000678939,0.00001547758,0.002082412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746003,0.0003609852,0.0244062,0.00001201984,0.000008470077,0.00001923525,0.00008265315,0.00000810458,0.0005020245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005487411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02902055,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1754485007968842,"score_gpt":0.4653120335271767,"score_spread":0.2898635327302925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}