{"id":"W2120217462","doi":"10.1109/glocom.2010.5684001","title":"Performance Evaluation of a Hybrid Cryptosystem with Authentication for Wireless Ad hoc Networks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Mobile Ad Hoc Networks","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Computer network; Wireless ad hoc network; Encryption; Public-key cryptography; Mobile ad hoc network; Authentication (law); Cryptography; Overhead (engineering); Key (lock); Wireless network; Node (physics); Vehicular ad hoc network; Computer security; Wireless; Cryptosystem; Hybrid cryptosystem; Telecommunications; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004243626,0.0007561968,0.0008634145,0.001473058,0.0007946948,0.001149223,0.0008059746,0.000951169,0.002236977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009714052,0.0001892829,0.000282696,0.001246412,0.000848198,0.003331295,0.001000053,0.0004498486,0.0003590499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001525843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009971628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009582608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005906076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963335,0.001444467,0.0002777137,0.0002762137,0.001264641,0.000403445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897658,0.006215437,0.0007546868,0.0009959557,0.00195699,0.0003111674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009341339,0.0009883278,0.01217494,0.0006898037,0.0004303982,0.000494313,0.0002544028,0.7054513,0.05213952,0.0334713,0.002958065,0.1816063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001761943,0.001164305,0.0009783446,0.00001133363,0.00004591507,0.0002673256,0.00003688989,0.9833592,0.01150526,0.001858846,0.0005729387,0.00002348861],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8223492,0.002506178,0.1615106,0.0003980435,0.0002134069,0.0004092544,0.0001651018,0.001291059,0.01115721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883631,0.0001381126,0.01077075,0.00001780026,0.00001786117,0.00004586292,0.00007645653,0.0000166778,0.0005533588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004243626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0224427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01463837076807594,"score_gpt":0.2452179364552365,"score_spread":0.2305795656871606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}