{"id":"W2120240281","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01683.x","title":"Putting prey and predator into the CO2 equation - qualitative and quantitative effects of ocean acidification on predator-prey interactions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Australian Research Council; Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, Australian Research Council; James Cook University","keywords":"Predation; Predator; Damselfish; Biology; Ecology; Ocean acidification; Coral reef fish; Coral reef; Ecosystem; Functional response; Climate change","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000743192,0.0002993325,0.0003624784,0.0002699237,0.0003242782,0.00006606108,0.0002495212,0.0002875612,0.00009769163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009721781,0.0002095676,0.00006744731,0.0001492025,0.0006634239,0.0002702602,0.00002809941,0.0007770525,0.00005175974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001937421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005007729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002316191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003365322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966694,0.00188818,0.0004141016,0.0005371923,0.0002153264,0.000275864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904584,0.008454841,0.0006267445,0.0003195927,0.00008206195,0.0000583869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00120859,0.0002010258,0.0974993,0.002707633,0.001927424,0.0001132074,0.2571601,0.0003718524,0.004458113,0.0007127239,0.6204994,0.01314064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001661959,0.003201247,0.9519435,0.0006718869,0.0008135676,0.00005151419,0.006105839,0.004934026,0.004670911,0.002988958,0.02170777,0.001248783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8574423,0.000302999,0.0002975285,0.1400396,0.00069701,0.0009877133,0.00009607245,0.00003914127,0.0000976381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9306042,0.0001496468,0.001272839,0.0668039,0.0003183881,0.00001834467,0.0006318355,0.00001956694,0.0001813005],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8544443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.854592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03024739133916599,"score_gpt":0.2796032182906468,"score_spread":0.2493558269514808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}