{"id":"W2120276728","doi":"10.5194/adgeo-1-73-2003","title":"CHAMP gravity field recovery using the energy balance approach","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in geosciences","topic":"Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam - Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ","keywords":"Gravitational field; Accelerometer; Geodesy; Satellite; Gravity of Earth; Field (mathematics); Calibration; Position (finance); Energy balance; Computation; Physics; Geology; Computer science; Classical mechanics; Mathematics; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002297439,0.0001122503,0.0001205779,0.00001531796,0.0001938947,0.00004842091,0.0002774264,0.00002461589,0.000115246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001569131,0.00007765964,0.00004787141,0.0003777291,0.0001299076,0.0004661518,0.00003291837,0.0001047584,0.000001735622],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001286965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006427099,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000928962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000149184,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990957,0.00006644083,0.000151146,0.0002570527,0.0001420672,0.0002875292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995682,0.0001050359,0.00008212379,0.0001955733,0.00001923404,0.00002984346],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001636211,0.0002355906,0.1899366,0.00001420947,0.0000112878,0.000001915865,0.0004153237,0.02844508,0.0002414845,0.5671964,0.0001686571,0.2133171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008274377,0.0002874431,0.002019849,0.00006663258,0.00001863773,0.00001152242,0.01127554,0.1000844,0.003662184,0.5708512,0.3097304,0.001164777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2408628,0.002941994,0.504078,0.00008398837,0.001500266,0.0001837474,0.00001003645,0.00002678148,0.2503124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919723,0.0001247354,0.006860014,0.000192256,0.00008984972,0.00001713871,0.000002861485,0.000004983075,0.0007358595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7511095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3166868,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006544297230807414,"score_gpt":0.2354833186395422,"score_spread":0.2289390214087348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}