{"id":"W2120313074","doi":"10.1002/hec.592","title":"Recognizing diversity in public preferences: The use of preference sub‐groups in cost‐effectiveness analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Economics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Diversity (politics); Homogeneous; Public health; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Sample (material); Actuarial science; Revealed preference; Health economics; Health care; Psychology; Cost–benefit analysis; Medicine; Social psychology; Cost effectiveness; Economics; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Risk analysis (engineering); Mathematics; Nursing; Sociology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02008275,0.0002432093,0.001652257,0.001235198,0.0002718603,0.0001052007,0.0005343237,0.0001888227,0.0001261679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001859865,0.0002811109,0.0001808495,0.001196601,0.0001181066,0.001111626,0.0002568217,0.000362713,0.0001261476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001951232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004465988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0191511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06055947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929274,0.001220667,0.004274409,0.0007844993,0.00006681233,0.0007262117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932073,0.002977389,0.002774449,0.000749559,0.00006969424,0.0002216027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004305985,0.0001458486,0.9710524,0.0002104311,0.0001032098,5.16784e-7,0.002082035,0.006502746,1.055884e-7,0.0177939,0.0001450909,0.001920668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000907781,0.00007214701,0.9540435,0.00009496849,0.00001207551,0.000001859851,0.0006613921,0.02767255,0.000001408109,0.008230535,0.008008093,0.0002937088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.987087,0.0007000534,0.001700363,0.007935787,0.0002921805,0.001527118,0.0002677757,0.00002423547,0.0004655064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924973,0.003444209,0.0004463516,0.003279915,0.00005155239,0.000164703,0.00006789724,0.00002114071,0.00002696574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04140838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999641,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7961172282876422,"score_gpt":0.4391364835803297,"score_spread":0.3569807447073125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}