{"id":"W2120334575","doi":"10.1016/j.annals.2003.12.003","title":"AN ANALYSIS OF WHALEWATCHING CODES OF CONDUCT","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Tourism Research","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Context (archaeology); Geography; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002115641,0.00008470008,0.0004121076,0.0002027174,0.00007292609,0.000007738493,0.0005219936,0.00004569984,0.001495037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002045998,0.00007297082,0.0001605169,0.001305806,0.0005054471,0.000189748,0.0004762922,0.0001529833,0.00001748035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002790106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002118454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05742263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004247479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979331,0.0001901572,0.0003632385,0.0002408465,0.0009570282,0.000315622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990515,0.0001595553,0.0001379099,0.0004250334,0.0001310978,0.00009496909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003114752,0.002505858,0.7622863,0.0004399916,0.002266122,0.00006635122,0.005396395,0.02730772,0.1469071,0.003948907,0.00877864,0.03978513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002477919,0.0007531648,0.887341,0.00005118614,0.00009645582,6.055303e-7,0.000837507,0.0003777213,0.1037717,0.005085703,0.001295362,0.00014188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879076,0.0003388058,0.00002522161,0.0007335141,0.000007002715,0.0001180939,0.00001919694,0.000004856786,0.01084565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982416,0.00076922,0.0008234046,0.00004727986,0.00001304509,0.000004316533,0.000004331103,0.000006968112,0.00008983396],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1250546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994177,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2306315990428751,"score_gpt":0.4567961494227216,"score_spread":0.2261645503798465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}