{"id":"W2120337222","doi":"10.1002/etc.2433","title":"Development and validation of a biotic ligand model for predicting chronic toxicity of lead to <i>Ceriodaphnia dubia</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"International Lead Association","keywords":"Ceriodaphnia dubia; Toxicity; Chronic toxicity; Lead (geology); Biotic Ligand Model; Toxicology; Biology; Environmental chemistry; Ecology; Cladocera; Ecotoxicology; Chemistry; Crustacean","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068525,0.0007516756,0.0005291752,0.000389992,0.0002660854,0.0005741324,0.0008740969,0.0008188487,0.0007576051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00111324,0.0002869093,0.0005811523,0.0002021491,0.0002141806,0.0002930064,0.0004673438,0.0005784365,0.0002387155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008994499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001329464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02519194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01165304,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998583,0.00003317153,0.00001419811,0.00004531088,0.00002985083,0.00001927173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994746,0.0002628818,0.00004617648,0.00002392552,0.0001608605,0.00003151236],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007848546,0.0001104667,0.005903118,0.00006113847,0.00005618895,0.00004817536,0.00001975409,0.9701891,0.01301151,0.0002567066,0.0001863565,0.01007913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006003767,0.00004543459,0.0005823955,0.000001412618,0.000006341574,0.000005046069,0.00000524318,0.9972042,0.00195939,0.0000519919,0.0001287619,0.000003702374],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.835357,0.0002635629,0.1596665,0.0001828946,0.00003450358,0.0001515486,0.0008102545,0.00109194,0.002441932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651034,0.0001084724,0.03301298,0.00004023502,0.000005560092,0.0001512274,0.0005783503,0.00003706228,0.0009627693],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02519194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05009061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008910418472160179,"score_gpt":0.2048297381087156,"score_spread":0.1959193196365554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}