{"id":"W2120423748","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026","title":"Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Guelph","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome British Columbia","keywords":"Biobank; Deliberation; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Public engagement; Informed consent; Political science; Corporate governance; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Medicine; Law; Business; Politics; Alternative medicine; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.4903428,0.0009639958,0.002065211,0.003462645,0.02367955,0.03707816,0.00676928,0.03720805,0.003498285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5267743,0.001941809,0.001549731,0.00241801,0.08333249,0.0293264,0.03231726,0.03882847,0.0008487437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01661715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1389112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005299522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006437349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.422242,0.5217715,0.01336005,0.009623956,0.01920937,0.01379318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2087323,0.712442,0.02309367,0.02377354,0.01401628,0.01794228],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028674,0.0005335959,0.00861119,0.0006440085,0.0001836217,0.0006839501,0.1926761,0.001786414,0.001329934,0.7225974,0.02411561,0.04655155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001610308,0.00009888571,0.001585773,0.001679322,0.00006704676,0.0001749894,0.05025145,0.002062029,0.001183343,0.86988,0.07273907,0.0001170118],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05230717,0.002014271,0.08040021,0.8196909,0.001686172,0.001061996,0.00005836635,0.0001120111,0.04266898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8734976,0.001244519,0.04622383,0.07267789,0.0009607524,0.001964473,0.00006532262,0.0001280802,0.00323762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4903428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6284981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7510898867525725,"score_gpt":0.6486792123851336,"score_spread":0.1024106743674389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}