{"id":"W2120444302","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.04001.x","title":"Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Molecular Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":647,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Arnold Arboretum; Harvard University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Phylogenetic tree; Biology; Phylogenetic comparative methods; Community structure; Taxon; Community; Ecology; Null model; Phylogenetics; Evolutionary biology; Cluster analysis; Habitat; Machine learning; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001900088,0.0002019674,0.001158286,0.0001905559,0.0001672077,0.00000279863,0.0005199453,0.0001992647,0.0003116936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002832175,0.0001448444,0.0002778641,0.0008656482,0.0003249574,0.00001254768,0.0002378606,0.0005375874,0.00001538513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009073297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001561899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002030132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02624262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972739,0.001835598,0.0003991204,0.0001968313,0.0001017683,0.0001928357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988923,0.0004162344,0.0003022913,0.0003656558,0.000007915873,0.00001559374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001161133,0.001118151,0.7660928,0.002368716,0.01167524,0.0003856577,0.03052434,0.06667642,0.00004318306,0.001012912,0.0003384982,0.1197524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002169473,0.0001677129,0.9506106,0.0001223535,0.004043577,0.00004396128,0.0006484853,0.0008562565,0.000001871466,0.0003709262,0.04247923,0.0004380566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2761005,0.7217203,0.000123678,0.00003015901,0.00007260343,0.0005589888,0.00007795676,0.000006130223,0.001309663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3996193,0.6000373,0.00004777892,0.0001204141,0.000002247393,0.00004366804,0.0001163435,0.00000498016,0.000007929383],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1845178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02741243097993769,"score_gpt":0.3197218466519962,"score_spread":0.2923094156720585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}