{"id":"W2120458855","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.01.006","title":"A size classification for debris flows","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engineering Geology","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"BGC Engineering (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Debris flow; Debris; Hazard; Documentation; Environmental science; Hazard analysis; Magnitude (astronomy); Hydrology (agriculture); Geology; Statistics; Computer science; Geography; Geotechnical engineering; Mathematics; Meteorology; Engineering; Reliability engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006750926,0.0008315346,0.0005129735,0.005864488,0.001030308,0.001393005,0.0009377621,0.0007146421,0.006186496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00273795,0.0002953736,0.001203805,0.002698107,0.0005163353,0.001986422,0.0007031336,0.0008936977,0.002759546],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006065267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008659188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00503086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003836041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993795,0.00004727983,0.0001020786,0.000125338,0.0002263155,0.0001193292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972039,0.0006865342,0.0002935964,0.0004683096,0.001044481,0.0003031548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006273077,0.000371258,0.06263299,0.0002604666,0.00005589533,0.0002962839,0.0004351138,0.00928772,0.05997358,0.02189038,0.02488836,0.8192806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001970111,0.001585619,0.2956148,0.0004450503,0.0003045012,0.003131499,0.002004264,0.396205,0.05456923,0.07785995,0.1677709,0.0003122104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3078915,0.001477151,0.6296064,0.0006697035,0.0006411574,0.0007559355,0.01158652,0.009177779,0.03819378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4955081,0.0005418106,0.4758229,0.0001239676,0.0003311242,0.0003950453,0.01413212,0.0006657784,0.01247922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006186496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02069587,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005630955264515191,"score_gpt":0.1965032742167565,"score_spread":0.1908723189522413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}