{"id":"W2120575990","doi":"10.1071/wf09134","title":"Peak detection in sediment–charcoal records: impacts of alternative data analysis methods on fire-history interpretations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Wildland Fire","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":339,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charcoal; Fire history; Sediment; Fire regime; Contrast (vision); Environmental science; Statistics; False positive paradox; Paleontology; Computer science; Geology; Mathematics; Climate change; Ecology; Oceanography; Artificial intelligence; Chemistry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001470171,0.0001430447,0.0003049108,0.0003418754,0.00002511875,0.00002495857,0.0009931821,0.00007979016,0.0008254466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005608132,0.0001219203,0.0001535619,0.0002652138,0.00009287714,0.0006465771,0.0001872371,0.0004659601,0.00002315369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005333771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004080831,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00323261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003778878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980968,0.0001954384,0.0006753908,0.0002503864,0.0006373204,0.0001447062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982941,0.0003652252,0.0008124517,0.0003446474,0.00008151006,0.0001021055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001136677,0.001267069,0.5182499,0.00002919262,0.00265592,0.0002068006,0.005444921,0.01260905,0.0774283,0.00003366949,0.005384904,0.3755535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002016194,0.0007844733,0.3973571,0.0002519672,0.0003354514,0.0001846271,0.0001854005,0.5784584,0.005452291,0.0003906264,0.01420111,0.0003823722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916944,0.00007172844,0.004099139,0.0002658262,0.002902037,0.0001109886,0.00005999579,0.000007073891,0.0007888325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968366,0.00004038048,0.00268421,0.00009978309,0.0002289579,0.000003376283,0.00002403508,0.00001219853,0.000070475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5658494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9038061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01697751347776403,"score_gpt":0.3152364915063808,"score_spread":0.2982589780286167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}