{"id":"W2120626248","doi":"10.1016/j.cageo.2006.02.010","title":"An empirical evaluation of spatial regression models","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Geosciences","topic":"Spatial and Panel Data Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Econometrics; Regression analysis; Statistics; Linear regression; Regression diagnostic; Computer science; Proper linear model; Regression; Statistical hypothesis testing; Spatial analysis; Empirical research; Set (abstract data type); Independence (probability theory); Sample size determination; Polynomial regression; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03049821,0.001146041,0.0008711668,0.002742569,0.0005641152,0.001746595,0.002156333,0.0009778365,0.006686653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1304746,0.0003790805,0.001194458,0.004670493,0.0009121207,0.002938356,0.001386777,0.001089105,0.0008487065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001706835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001493479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02376153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01356873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9825168,0.01513482,0.0004033349,0.000611839,0.00111224,0.00022092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7956852,0.1877599,0.002803568,0.00664409,0.006599103,0.0005081551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001480208,0.0007637123,0.09971378,0.0006269605,0.00118968,0.0003785921,0.0008259739,0.5150222,0.0005760247,0.1348872,0.01196883,0.2325668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001000232,0.0002801962,0.009809672,0.00008230701,0.0002596977,0.0001079999,0.0006002165,0.9581496,0.0004907383,0.0262577,0.00383592,0.00002597028],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7142259,0.007089374,0.2486307,0.00610905,0.0002586065,0.0001787907,0.002223049,0.001115297,0.02016921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477133,0.002140187,0.04513414,0.0001658932,0.0001834635,0.00007418833,0.001554193,0.0002038607,0.002830816],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03049821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1612918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09965555278562267,"score_gpt":0.3057037009521233,"score_spread":0.2060481481665007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}