{"id":"W2120823619","doi":"10.1139/x11-162","title":"Examining the utility of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System in boreal peatlands","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Alberta; Wilfrid Laurier University; Canadian Forest Service; University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Peat; Boreal; Environmental science; Taiga; Water content; Hydrology (agriculture); Soil water; Moisture; Water table; Forestry; Physical geography; Soil science; Ecology; Geography; Geology; Groundwater; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002071564,0.0003700342,0.0002416882,0.001450836,0.0009506615,0.001024089,0.0005310848,0.0002121399,0.0003584406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005132555,0.0001538015,0.0002831203,0.00167581,0.0004574081,0.0004978383,0.0004998751,0.0003009071,0.00005838194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004791135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004590984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9532188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993993,0.0001537947,0.00003186604,0.00009384654,0.000165062,0.0001562494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974911,0.0004712728,0.0003287891,0.00008091575,0.001245892,0.0003819547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006899825,0.00002383797,0.9940328,0.000008830521,0.00002795339,0.00003616783,0.0004305656,0.0003780949,0.0004465756,0.00006718716,0.0001400955,0.004338859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001268824,0.00001611705,0.9982592,0.000005212516,0.00000719481,0.000009818245,0.000542831,0.0009323145,0.00007394987,0.00001049239,0.0001375246,0.000003917596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986084,0.00007506648,0.000126053,0.00002999767,0.000003964829,0.00001259206,0.0003510831,0.000003585534,0.0007893534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990983,0.00004195917,0.0003488592,0.000009520835,0.000001789968,0.000006503856,0.0003440955,0.000002341516,0.0001466351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04678124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09411341,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06519471437722328,"score_gpt":0.2660496501566927,"score_spread":0.2008549357794694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}