{"id":"W2120853321","doi":"10.1175/2009jpo4311.1","title":"Modal Interpretation for the Ekman Destabilization of Inviscidly Stable Baroclinic Flow in the Phillips Model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physical Oceanography","topic":"Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Baroclinity; Barotropic fluid; Ekman layer; Ekman transport; Physics; Ekman number; Classical mechanics; Inviscid flow; Rossby wave; Mechanics; Geology; Flow (mathematics); Boundary layer; Atmospheric sciences","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002635261,0.0002868079,0.0002126676,0.0004610402,0.0003881719,0.0007845691,0.0004296706,0.000354322,0.002380894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007279303,0.000132029,0.0003068738,0.0001407526,0.001148018,0.0009235101,0.001117104,0.0004064454,0.0001613238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004322811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002479782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001097727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008144924,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999075,0.00002321844,0.00000573514,0.00001572632,0.00003067416,0.00001725688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999811,0.00003824843,0.0000545064,0.00002799495,0.00003748232,0.00003084544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001284765,0.00003744583,0.00380006,0.00005434946,0.0000291211,0.0007029904,0.0005285303,0.1104297,0.02235912,0.8543885,0.001142282,0.006399327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002769824,0.00008229415,0.003311027,0.00001449277,0.00002015025,0.0001775082,0.0002300815,0.7234259,0.002501422,0.2689063,0.001274138,0.00002899345],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8251748,0.0001722318,0.1335762,0.0009490988,0.00009001218,0.00002317569,0.00007054815,0.0002373152,0.03970663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997466,0.00003696245,0.0009742703,0.00002295322,0.00001669053,0.000009029292,0.000007057321,0.000008511796,0.00145864],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002380894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007964909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009857096414966968,"score_gpt":0.2354579757014348,"score_spread":0.2256008792864678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}