{"id":"W2120853321","doi":"10.1175/2009jpo4311.1","title":"Modal Interpretation for the Ekman Destabilization of Inviscidly Stable Baroclinic Flow in the Phillips Model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physical Oceanography","topic":"Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Baroclinity; Barotropic fluid; Ekman layer; Ekman transport; Physics; Ekman number; Classical mechanics; Inviscid flow; Rossby wave; Mechanics; Geology; Flow (mathematics); Boundary layer; Atmospheric sciences","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000359028,0.0001066806,0.0002025461,0.0001489042,0.0000378636,0.00002897632,0.0002541282,0.00003524453,8.763521e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003454914,0.00006152654,0.0002978028,0.0003626499,0.00003418469,0.0002272831,0.000006314683,0.0002026043,2.000298e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001645765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000148539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.815766e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003239518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991457,0.00002918351,0.0003940363,0.0000654656,0.0002290839,0.0001364578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993702,0.0002511973,0.0001160631,0.0001355013,0.00009795463,0.0000290938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005359171,0.000127198,0.0002483346,0.00002343958,0.00002641351,3.524045e-7,0.00137425,0.9913787,0.001669689,0.001979663,0.0002153425,0.002903083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003797877,0.000258046,0.001817346,0.00004364153,0.00004860121,0.000001369373,0.00006529602,0.9772416,0.0002688222,0.0197782,0.00003159826,0.00006570717],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8408573,0.0002345915,0.1582371,0.0002601095,0.00009840861,0.0001922074,0.00001020441,0.000009320384,0.000100782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984393,0.00008378286,0.001248834,0.00008828041,0.0001213309,0.000002810569,0.000003576547,0.00001091779,0.000001159963],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.157582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2508979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009857096414966968,"score_gpt":0.2354579757014348,"score_spread":0.2256008792864678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}