{"id":"W2120870268","doi":"10.1117/12.819499","title":"Optical Coherence Tomography in archaeological and conservation science - a new emerging field","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE","topic":"Optical Coherence Tomography Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trent University; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Optical coherence tomography; Computer science; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Conservation; Field (mathematics); Tomography; Conservation science; Computed tomography; Data science; Archaeology; Optics; History; Physics; Radiology; Medicine; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004107951,0.0004191719,0.0006667954,0.002519676,0.0009494455,0.003911781,0.0006820519,0.002867601,0.001843985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002909253,0.0002245512,0.0002180819,0.002807398,0.005297695,0.004891376,0.001339641,0.002077813,0.000381459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001551075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001728991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001428446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001987613,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990255,0.0004288839,0.00006093934,0.0001176735,0.0003023093,0.00006478062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959683,0.002625933,0.0002867722,0.000166958,0.0007438418,0.0002081667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008518698,0.0001097394,0.007116367,0.002035504,0.00004181755,0.0008564503,0.001045221,0.001058196,0.00911316,0.1381501,0.01469442,0.8256938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003762102,0.0003311946,0.01340521,0.004817096,0.00006997093,0.006018256,0.005352431,0.005789897,0.009770201,0.2363825,0.7178357,0.0001899332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01536012,0.8563375,0.03759329,0.06890426,0.002350877,0.00004274667,0.00008973089,0.00008894857,0.01923252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1459184,0.7712194,0.06232221,0.007742987,0.006309943,0.0000664468,0.00007127322,0.00005117111,0.006298048],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004107951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02172518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01550901212163846,"score_gpt":0.2348198428052765,"score_spread":0.219310830683638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}