{"id":"W2120920211","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.07.020","title":"Can the reliability of three-dimensional running kinematics be improved using functional joint methodology?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gait & Posture","topic":"Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Running Injury Clinic","funders":"Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions","keywords":"Kinematics; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Gait analysis; Repeatability; Joint (building); Motion analysis; Gait; Offset (computer science); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Statistics; Medicine; Engineering; Physics; Structural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02879282,0.001726011,0.001708872,0.00333817,0.0004251587,0.002136145,0.002176811,0.00242662,0.002288922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09641444,0.0008323982,0.001411491,0.002003327,0.001503858,0.003311129,0.001294757,0.0006817342,0.001429406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000242772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005359647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001758916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002875876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9887552,0.006796787,0.0012435,0.001445691,0.001434027,0.000324849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9293795,0.03318458,0.00921194,0.01391185,0.01373377,0.0005784284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001942168,0.0002731517,0.4754277,0.001543463,0.002352429,0.0002456384,0.001010736,0.01583789,0.03103323,0.002285351,0.002146876,0.4659014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000185174,0.002082502,0.7679493,0.0006736618,0.001308242,0.002675629,0.0009244247,0.1823417,0.02193681,0.01301778,0.0065042,0.0004006129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4196805,0.003331311,0.5697015,0.001279915,0.0008699175,0.00009815294,0.0009320577,0.001373583,0.002733131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9201573,0.0009244622,0.076813,0.0003096163,0.0002799639,0.00009495525,0.0005124108,0.0002630569,0.0006452881],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02879282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1522728,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06339371959906934,"score_gpt":0.2536402950550302,"score_spread":0.1902465754559609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}