{"id":"W2120925410","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003080","title":"Quantification of the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance monitoring using an electronic monitoring system: a retrospective cohort study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Quality & Safety","topic":"Infection Control in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":201,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"Gojo Industries","keywords":"Medicine; Hygiene; Hawthorne effect; Compliance (psychology); Retrospective cohort study; Cohort study; Electronic surveillance; Cohort; Medical emergency; Emergency medicine; Surgery; Internet privacy; Internal medicine; Pathology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003987529,0.0003803939,0.0004568789,0.001079145,0.0006062479,0.0009546921,0.0005896914,0.0005308358,0.001143316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008254131,0.0005593984,0.0007926354,0.001197903,0.0005665295,0.0008048211,0.0007120238,0.0007370524,0.0002828845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003858189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005185244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004358364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003295994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968641,0.0009463178,0.0003640188,0.0008834147,0.0006656933,0.0002765485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990019,0.001997496,0.004619721,0.001827152,0.0009837333,0.0005529649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007605075,0.00002161137,0.9990176,0.000008473648,0.00005329882,0.00003475846,0.00007351008,0.00001187167,0.0001046332,0.00001067944,0.0000314338,0.0005560443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004739549,0.000246903,0.9988797,0.00001000809,0.00004072126,0.0002879525,0.0001789944,0.0001269016,0.00006633785,0.00001416615,0.0001376296,0.000005839761],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985903,0.0003000796,0.0005015127,0.0000178809,0.00000913471,0.0000388873,0.0002518173,0.000005644722,0.0002847191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992039,0.000117455,0.0002676745,0.00002048078,0.00001120449,0.00003160798,0.0002132315,0.000005492911,0.0001290855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004358364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02108836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0939463943361705,"score_gpt":0.4330719004073854,"score_spread":0.3391255060712148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}