{"id":"W2120962313","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2014.07.109","title":"A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF TWO-STENT TECHNIQUES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CORONARY BIFURCATION LESIONS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Mace; Stent; Meta-analysis; Myocardial infarction; Odds ratio; Conventional PCI; Surgery; Radiology; Internal medicine; Cardiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00464923,0.002379979,0.01718195,0.004137696,0.0006770161,0.002282546,0.001654252,0.002238306,0.003292759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01535664,0.0009834433,0.02405444,0.004464998,0.0006851357,0.001474754,0.001198928,0.002087889,0.0002902654],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001654302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00262301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006599452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01956941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960662,0.001598371,0.001258491,0.0004169277,0.0005019171,0.0001580862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934781,0.004712766,0.001003371,0.0001745927,0.0005160914,0.0001151281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005241751,0.00009497855,0.001737171,0.5290711,0.4320782,0.0002076043,0.0001238595,0.0004646738,0.0005186536,0.0001416672,0.0008279192,0.02949235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001677034,0.0005113159,0.002872454,0.02917218,0.9625975,0.0001675104,0.00007726282,0.0001344377,0.0001345853,0.0002018802,0.002417037,0.00003685217],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00394074,0.9950813,0.0002598649,0.00009288861,0.0001443768,0.0001445676,0.0001643576,0.000009554532,0.0001623131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07825253,0.9186574,0.001434671,0.0006093513,0.000205213,0.000258326,0.0002930813,0.00001137677,0.0002780567],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01718195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02458781,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1255121520229688,"score_gpt":0.39254042861205,"score_spread":0.2670282765890812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}