{"id":"W2121222464","doi":"10.1139/l02-067","title":"Determination of seismic design forces by equivalent static load method","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Structural engineering; Shear (geology); Building code; Moment (physics); Seismic hazard; Seismic analysis; Response spectrum; Engineering; Hazard; Base (topology); Seismic loading; Shear force; Vibration; Geotechnical engineering; Mathematics; Geology; Mathematical analysis; Civil engineering; Acoustics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005831248,0.0008215131,0.0004181299,0.00242114,0.0004084321,0.0004722677,0.0009771236,0.0003902492,0.01267124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003046999,0.0003322199,0.000393325,0.0008896184,0.0003087802,0.000617246,0.0005169132,0.0004167977,0.003378762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001221173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001373968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01456304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01859961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987363,0.0001378381,0.0000449728,0.0001085956,0.0008975126,0.00007478262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992146,0.0001705407,0.00007006416,0.00007142474,0.0004533179,0.00002001629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001796597,0.0001771429,0.009555671,0.0001261754,0.0000254513,0.0001603509,0.0002673065,0.3299973,0.03361437,0.02252336,0.004601661,0.5987714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003157126,0.0001134594,0.01037773,0.00001810929,0.0000136748,0.00008797606,0.00009722194,0.9611807,0.01125798,0.004592598,0.01219411,0.00003478795],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04644855,0.00002922615,0.9332778,0.00003014184,0.00002900203,0.0001560825,0.000365931,0.0009505333,0.01871277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5478355,0.000112011,0.429783,0.00006250454,0.00003611587,0.0005098536,0.001501434,0.0004655153,0.01969407],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01456304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04238951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01160151193041628,"score_gpt":0.217043405960483,"score_spread":0.2054418940300667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}