{"id":"W2121222464","doi":"10.1139/l02-067","title":"Determination of seismic design forces by equivalent static load method","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Seismic Performance and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Structural engineering; Shear (geology); Building code; Moment (physics); Seismic hazard; Seismic analysis; Response spectrum; Engineering; Hazard; Base (topology); Seismic loading; Shear force; Vibration; Geotechnical engineering; Mathematics; Geology; Mathematical analysis; Civil engineering; Acoustics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004903889,0.0001291457,0.0002509615,0.0003489096,0.00002510683,0.0000212574,0.0001371146,0.00004198996,0.00009754093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009903873,0.0001332874,0.00009338045,0.0002463881,0.00001114959,0.0002235949,0.000001811043,0.0001480866,0.000002132621],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002957767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002429569,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001763489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001232999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991049,0.00002199299,0.0003798739,0.00005989687,0.000165411,0.0002678999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993974,0.00007024766,0.00008578711,0.00009680686,0.00009749454,0.0002522671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[8.856039e-7,0.000002128966,0.00006504771,0.00008463038,0.00006016532,0.0000155777,0.0003598484,0.9897568,0.005228906,0.00002204136,0.001217595,0.003186333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025626,0.00004506363,0.00003836219,0.0001472948,0.0000790146,0.00007992415,0.000104595,0.9653531,0.02314556,0.0001166996,0.01045758,0.0001765442],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03230182,0.001959024,0.9649122,0.00001636512,0.0002371904,0.00004071141,0.000006709017,0.000013312,0.0005126497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870707,0.0001036399,0.01269448,0.00002491155,0.00003097188,0.000001826192,0.000001044455,0.00002592259,0.00004649828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9547689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54353,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01160151193041628,"score_gpt":0.217043405960483,"score_spread":0.2054418940300667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}